Indemnification Clause
A properly worded indemnification clause is critical to reducing risk in a construction contract. An indemnification clause may include any, or all, of three distinct obligations, including to (1) indemnify, (2) defend, and (3) hold harmless the client. Indemnify means to reimburse your client following a loss. [printfriendly]
Chapter on Indemnification Clauses
Kent Holland’s chapter on indemnification clauses is included here. Details include avoiding uninsurable losses.
a/e ProNet
The a/e ProNet website provides numerous educational articles and papers addressing design professional liability and risk management, including indemnification clauses and limitation of liability clauses. Three articles by Kent Holland addressing indemnification clauses are available at a/e ProNet.
Additional articles on this website.
- Indemnification Clauses, Part 4 Indemnification Clause Should Limit Indemnification to Third Party Tort Claims
- Indemnification Clauses, Part 5 The Changing Face of Indemnity by Brian K. Stewart, Esq., Collins, Collins, Muir + Stewart, LLP. Also found here on the a/e ProNet website.
The a/e ProNet members are independent, specialist insurance brokers. Each has demonstrated exceptional knowledge, service, and commitment to the design community before receiving an invitation to join this long-standing professional network. Together, these brokers represent more than 16,000 architecture and engineering firms of all sizes and across all disciplines.
Related Articles by Kent Holland
Sample Indemnification Clause
Kent Holland provides six sample indemnification clauses, each addressing unique aspects of indemnity.
Sample 1:
Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs that Client is legally obligated to pay as a result of the death or bodily injury to any person or the destruction or damage to any property, to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability.
Sample 2: For California contracts must add that there is no duty to defend:
Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless (but not defend) the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs that Client is legally obligated to pay as a result of the death or bodily injury to any person or the destruction or damage to any property, to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability.
Sample 3: Instead of referencing BI and PD, reference “third party claims”
Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs arising out of third party claims to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability.
Sample 4: Include a duty to defend in the main text for CGL type claims but add sentence at conclusion to carve out professional liability claims.
Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs arising out of third party claims to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability. The duty to defend shall not apply to professional liability claims.
Sample 5: A different way to address defense obligations:
The foregoing defend, hold harmless and indemnity obligations of this paragraph shall apply solely to any such causes of action, damages, costs, expenses or defense obligations covered by Consultant’s Insurance specified in this Agreement.
Sample 6: Instead of agreeing to indemnify for all damages, including reasonable attorneys fees, strike out the attorneys fees in the body of the indemnity clause and use the simple one sentence shown in the above examples for attorneys fees or use the following:
Consultant agrees to reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs, provided however that such obligation is limited to the portion of such costs equal to the percentage of Consultant’s liability as ultimately determined to be caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of Consultant using principles of comparative fault.
Indemnification Clause Articles from ConstructionRisk.com Reports
Indemnity Obligation Includes First Party Attorneys Fees Based on Language of the Clause
An indemnity clause in an easement agreement required the indemnitor (contractor) to pay the Indemnitees (adjoining property owner) first party attorneys fees that were incurred in suing the contractor for property damages. This was a “Crane Swing, Tie Back and Swing...
Indemnification Clause Unenforceable where Inconsistent with a State’s Contribution Act Applicable to Joint Tortfeasors
By: Kent Holland A contract required the architect to indemnify its project owner client (a hotel) against damages and attorneys fees arising from injuries on hotel property. The hotel, architect and others entered into settlement agreements with a plaintiff that...
Court Affirms that Indemnification Clauses Traditionally Used and Interpreted as Extending Only to Third-Party Claims – Cannot be Used for First Party Damages from Breach of Contract
By: J. Kent Holland, Jr. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed a U.S. District Court decision that granted summary judgment to an engineer, holding that the statute of limitations had run on a breach of contract action, and the...
Indemnification Clause Required Indemnification Only for Damages Caused by Indemnitor
Where a subcontracted laborer brought personal injury action against a general contractor (GC), the GC filed suit against subcontractor to require it to indemnify it for any damages awarded against it. The laborer alleged he was injured from toxic fumes while...
When Engineer Refused Obligations under an Indemnification Clause to Defend its Homebuilder Client, Suit Against it for Breach of Contract does not Require Certificate of Merit
Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Where an engineer entered into a contract with a homebuilder, its contract included a broad form indemnification clause that included a duty to defend and an obligation to indemnify for all claims and damages regardless of...
Connect