Indemnification Clause
A properly worded indemnification clause is critical to reducing risk in a construction contract. An indemnification clause may include any, or all, of three distinct obligations, including to (1) indemnify, (2) defend, and (3) hold harmless the client. Indemnify means to reimburse your client following a loss. [printfriendly]
Chapter on Indemnification Clauses
Kent Holland’s chapter on indemnification clauses is included here. Details include avoiding uninsurable losses.
a/e ProNet
The a/e ProNet website provides numerous educational articles and papers addressing design professional liability and risk management, including indemnification clauses and limitation of liability clauses. Three articles by Kent Holland addressing indemnification clauses are available at a/e ProNet.
Additional articles on this website.
- Indemnification Clauses, Part 4 Indemnification Clause Should Limit Indemnification to Third Party Tort Claims
- Indemnification Clauses, Part 5 The Changing Face of Indemnity by Brian K. Stewart, Esq., Collins, Collins, Muir + Stewart, LLP. Also found here on the a/e ProNet website.
The a/e ProNet members are independent, specialist insurance brokers. Each has demonstrated exceptional knowledge, service, and commitment to the design community before receiving an invitation to join this long-standing professional network. Together, these brokers represent more than 16,000 architecture and engineering firms of all sizes and across all disciplines.
Related Articles by Kent Holland
Sample Indemnification Clause
Kent Holland provides six sample indemnification clauses, each addressing unique aspects of indemnity.
Sample 1:
Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs that Client is legally obligated to pay as a result of the death or bodily injury to any person or the destruction or damage to any property, to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability.
Sample 2: For California contracts must add that there is no duty to defend:
Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless (but not defend) the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs that Client is legally obligated to pay as a result of the death or bodily injury to any person or the destruction or damage to any property, to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability.
Sample 3: Instead of referencing BI and PD, reference “third party claims”
Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs arising out of third party claims to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability.
Sample 4: Include a duty to defend in the main text for CGL type claims but add sentence at conclusion to carve out professional liability claims.
Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Client, its officers, directors, employees, from and against those liabilities, damages and costs arising out of third party claims to the extent caused by the willful misconduct, negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant or anyone for whom the Consultant is legally responsible, subject to any limitations of liability contained in this Agreement. Consultant will reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs for claims arising out of Consultant’s professional negligence based on the percentage of Consultant’s liability. The duty to defend shall not apply to professional liability claims.
Sample 5: A different way to address defense obligations:
The foregoing defend, hold harmless and indemnity obligations of this paragraph shall apply solely to any such causes of action, damages, costs, expenses or defense obligations covered by Consultant’s Insurance specified in this Agreement.
Sample 6: Instead of agreeing to indemnify for all damages, including reasonable attorneys fees, strike out the attorneys fees in the body of the indemnity clause and use the simple one sentence shown in the above examples for attorneys fees or use the following:
Consultant agrees to reimburse Client for reasonable defense costs, provided however that such obligation is limited to the portion of such costs equal to the percentage of Consultant’s liability as ultimately determined to be caused by the willful misconduct or negligence of Consultant using principles of comparative fault.
Indemnification Clause Articles from ConstructionRisk.com Reports
Design-Builder Entitled to Contractual Indemnity from Subcontractor for Damages to Turbines
Black & Veatch (“B & V”) contracted with Portland General Electric (“PGE”) to engineer, procure and construct a power generating facility called the Port Westward Power Plant, and it subcontracted to a specialty subcontractor to install the combustion turbine...
Architect Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Indemnification Obligation Owed to Project Owner
In a wrongful death action brought by the estate of an electrician against a project owner and its architect, the owner made a cross claim for indemnification and contribution against the Architect. That claim was dismissed pursuant to a motion for summary judgment,...
Contractual Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Breach of Contract Claim against Contractor by a Third Party
A general contractor under contract to the Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority (DART) was sued by the owner of a building adjacent to the construction site, alleging that water damage was caused by the contractor’s negligent construction activities. In addition to...
Additional Insured Contractor’s Right to be Defended & Incorporation of Prime Contract Indemnity Obligations into the Subcontract
Two employees of a subcontractor sued the prime contractor for their personal injuries resulting from a fall. The prime contractor in turn sued the subcontractor and the subcontractor’s insurance carriers for breach of a duty to defend and indemnify the contractor in...
Statute of Repose Bars Indemnification Claim against Engineer that Designed Bridge that Collapsed
Because the 10 year state statute of repose made Jacobs Engineers immune from liability for the collapse of the I-35W bridge across the Mississippi River, it was not subject to suit by URS (the subsequent bridge inspection engineer) since there was no common liability...
Connect