by Kent Holland | Jul 13, 2015 | Newsletter Article
Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Although parties are free to negotiate away a contractor’s right to recover for delay damages, the Supreme Court of Texas held that a “no-damages-for-delay” provision in a contract cannot shield a project owner from liability...
by Kent Holland | Mar 29, 2013 | Newsletter Article
Where a jury awarded a contractor approximately $19 million for delay and impact costs caused by actions of the project owner (including breach of contract), the judgment was reversed on appeal. Also, an award of $10.5 Million attorneys fees was granted to the Owner...
by Kent Holland | May 23, 2011 | Newsletter Article
Where a contractor signed a contract with a municipality that included a clear and unambiguous “no damages for delay” clause, it was held that such a clause did not violate public policy, and that as a result of the clause the contractor was not entitled to recover...
by Kent Holland | Feb 8, 2011 | Newsletter Article
Where an electrical contractor was delayed in completing its work, the project owner, school district, asserted that the contractor’s claim for delay damages was barred by a “no damages for delay” clause in the contract. The trail court concluded that the...
by Kent Holland | Feb 8, 2011 | Newsletter Article
A construction contractor was delayed in completing a road construction project by a flaw in the design provided by the project engineer. The project owner (Broward County, Florida) denied the contractor’s delay and impact claim, asserting that it was barred by a...
Connect